Holy and Great Council

The Synaxis of Primates: A Prelude to Conciliarity and Unity

Published on: June 17, 2016
Total views: 556
Readers' rating:
4.2
(46)
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Amid a great storm of words and clouds of recriminations, first His All-Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, and then the other venerable presidents of the autocephalous Churches, landed at airports in Crete and stepped off their planes to clear and sunny days typical of this Greek island that enjoys apostolic roots. The words of His All-Holiness upon arrival, echoed by the other primates, expressed “joy of fulfillment of our historical mission.” The “our” he referenced are all the other autocephalous Orthodox Churches from around the world, both those Churches who have come, and the four who have stayed home. With this call he also urged the Churches to move from what they call their own individually, to what the whole Church can call its own collectively, from the local to the universal, to manifest not only the fourteen Churches united in mind and heart, but the one holy Orthodox Church, which is the essence of a conciliar vision.

The refusals of those local Churches who didn’t come are based on different reasons, no doubt sincerely held. But these four Churches pointed to a lack of consensus on one or another point related to the council, either substantive, that is, the six texts under consideration, or procedural, that is, not all the Churches are present. Therefore, they claim, no consensus of the Church can be had.

Nevertheless, His All-Holiness recalled for all the Churches that the decision and responsibility to convene a Holy and Great Council “lies with those same churches and their primates.” He referred here to the consensus already expressed just four months earlier, in January 2016 at the Synaxis of Primates (or First hierarchs). Representatives of the Church of Antioch did refuse to sign the agreement – though they never objected throughout the deliberations to the convocation of the council – but the other Churches all expressed their consent and signed the agreement to hold this council. Thus, in principle, all churches consented in January 2016, just as they had earlier in March 2014 to convene the Holy and Great Council. This consent fulfilled the conciliar vision of the modern Orthodox Church expressed repeatedly by all the Churches for over a hundred years in endless meetings, congresses, commissions, consultations, and Synaxes of the heads of the Churches. Consent, something that has provoked so much concern, has in fact been expressed; but it has not been accorded the respect currently in such high demand.

Even now, while the Synaxis of the Primates has completed its task and as the Holy and Great Council stands ready to begin, the primates gathered in Crete have renewed their call to those Churches not present to join them on their journey (syn-odos) toward unity in the Holy Spirit “that fills all that is lacking.” No one in Crete considers it too late for those churches to reconsider their later decisions not to attend.

Controversies and hopes for reconciliation as well as renewed commitment to conciliarity and unity, important as they might be in the life of the Church, matter little if the same conciliar vision does not cast its gaze on the larger world. Mercy, love, compassion, and reconciliation of all in Christ and with each other by the grace of the Spirit are what would truly fulfill the promise of a council and the unity of the Church.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

As you’ve reached the conclusion of the article, we have a humble request. The preparation and publication of this article were made possible, in part, by the support of our readers. Even the smallest monthly donation contributes to empowering our editorial team to produce valuable content. Your support is truly significant to us. If you appreciate our work, consider making a donation – every contribution matters. Thank you for being a vital part of our community.

Public Orthodoxy seeks to promote conversation by providing a forum for diverse perspectives on contemporary issues related to Orthodox Christianity. The positions expressed in this essay are solely the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the Orthodox Christian Studies Center.

About authors

Have something on your mind?

Thanks for reading this article! If you feel that you ready to join the discussion, we welcome high-caliber unsolicited submissions. Essays may cover any topic relevant to our credo – Bridging the Ecclesial, the Academic, and the Political. Follow the link below to check our guidlines and submit your essay.

Proceed to submission page

Rate this publication

Did you find this essay interesting?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 4.2 / 5. Vote count: 46

Be the first to rate this essay.

Share this publication

Disclaimer

Public Orthodoxy seeks to promote conversation by providing a forum for diverse perspectives on contemporary issues related to Orthodox Christianity. The positions expressed in the articles on this website are solely the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the Orthodox Christian Studies Center.

Attribution

Public Orthodoxy is a publication of the Orthodox Christian Studies Center of Fordham University