Documents, Religion and Conflict, Religion and Politics

A Statement of Solidarity with the Orthodox Declaration on the “Russian World” (Russkii Mir) Teaching, and against Christian Nationalism and New Totalitarianism

Published on: April 6, 2022
Readers' rating:
Reading Time: 4 minutes
Also available in: Русский

This statement was originally posted at Religion in Praxis and is reposted here with permission. Also available in Russian and Ukrainian (pdf).

Image: Main Cathedral of the Russian Armed Forces.

Following the invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation in February 2022, Orthodox voices have thoroughly rebutted the use of the “Russian World” (russkii mir) teaching, which claims that there is an organically unified transnational orthodox Christian Russian civilization that includes the territories and people of Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and sometimes other nations, to justify the current war. This statement seeks a) to facilitate support from among non-Orthodox Christian scholars for the rejection of the “russkii mir” teaching; b) to reject unholy alliances between Christian identity and political power which have also emerged in the context of Christian Nationalism; and c) to call for the development of an ecumenical “Theology after Christendom”. We invite support from Christian scholars and clergy, and are open to those who do not share the Christian language of this statement, but who share its purpose. 

“There is no Holy One like the Lord,
no one besides you;
there is no Rock like our God.
Talk no more so very proudly,
Let not arrogance come from your mouth;
For the Lord is a God of knowledge,
And by him actions are weighed”

From Hannah’s Prayer, 1 Samuel 2

We recognise that Christian traditions historically ascribe holiness to God alone. Neither nation or state, nor any political community can legitimately claim intrinsic holiness. 

Christian identity is not singularly, exclusively, or supremely held by a nation, a race, or a civilisation. The integrity of the Christian witness is distorted where it is used to create separation between people and people, between race and race, between nation and nation, and between civilisation and civilisation. 

We therefore stand against “Christian Nationalism”, “Christian Europe” and the “Russian World” 

Russia and wider Europe have historically been home to a plurality of religious, ethnic, and linguistic communities. The integrity of the Christian witness is distorted by political aggression, the infliction of bodily harm, suffering, and disadvantage, or the denial of the rights and integrity of communities with whom we coexist—be it in name of Christian Nationalism or in name of the so-called Russian World (Holy Rus). 

We remember that Christianity has often been slow to recognise the danger of its complicity in political violence 

Christian identity has been misused against both Christians and non-Christians: in outbursts of sectarian violence, in the horrific persecution of Jewish and other minorities, and against the peoples of the world who Christian colonisers sought to forcibly convert. The integrity of the Christian witness is distorted by the use of aggression in matters of religion and by the use of religion in matters of aggression. 

We call on other Christian scholars in Europe and beyond to speak out against unholy alliances between Christian identity and political power 

Christian scholars must be ready and willing to speak out against unholy alliances of Christianity and political power, and especially in the context of nationalism, populism, and new forms of totalitarianism. The integrity of the Christian witness is distorted when the appropriation of Christian identity remains uncontested from within Christian traditions. 

We laud the <Declaration on the “Russian World” (russkii mir) Teaching> from within parts of the international Orthodox community 

The abuse of the Russian World teaching has been thoroughly rebutted as non-Orthodox by international Orthodox voices. Orthodox theologians have not hesitated to condemn the fratricidal war against Ukraine as “the repetition of the sin of Cain”. The integrity of the Christian witness is honoured by Christian solidarity with those who speak truth to power. 

We call for the development of an ecumenical “Theology after Christendom” 

Drawing upon Scripture, reason, and the rich traditions of the Christian churches around the world, 21st-century Christianity needs to nourish its reflection on theology and political thought, specifically investing in an ecumenical “Theology after Christendom”. Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant scholars must support one another in resisting the sacralisation of political communities, and in offering resources to articulate a theology committed to the common good, to truthfulness, and to justice. 


  1. Cyril Hovorun
  2. Marietta van der Tol
  3. Petr Kratochvíl
  4. Katharina Kunter
  5. Sophia Johnson
  6. Jenny Leith
  7. John Heathershaw
  8. Milena Benovska
  9. Mika Vähäkangas
  10. Kristine Margvelashvili
  11. Rosita Garškaitė
  12. Tobias Koellner
  13. Courtney Kane
  14. Magnus Hagevi
  15. Hossein Dabbagh
  16. Andrew Marshall
  17. Marko Vekovic
  18. Zachary Calo
  19. Gionathan Lo Mascolo
  20. Samer Alnasir
  21. Zoran Grozdanov
  22. Jürgen Moltmann
  23. Nicholas Wolterstorff
  24. Tomáš Halík
  25. Miroslav Volf
  26. Pantelis Kalaitzidis
  27. Aristotle Papanikolaou
  28. Brandon Gallaher
  29. Ryan McAnnally-Linz
  30. Jose Casanova
  31. Markus Meckel
  32. Oliver O’Donovan
  33. Roman Soloviy
  34. Oleksandr Geychencko
  35. Viktória Kóczián
  36. Ivana Noble
  37. Richard René
  38. Stephen Finamore
  39. Nikolaos Asproulis
  40. Paul Ladouceur
  41. Hadje C. Sadje
  42. Muthuraj Swamy
  43. Iványi Gábor
  44. Paul Freston
  45. Jonathan Chaplin
  46. Laurens Hogebrink
  47. Peter Ben de Smit
  48. Nathaniel Wood
  49. Rachel Muers
  50. Eduard Berdnyk
  51. David Montgomery
  52. Nicholas Sooy
  53. Katya Tolstoj
  54. Joanildo Burity
  55. István Zalatnay
  56. Ulrich Schmiedel
  57. Georgios Vlantis
  58. Fabiny Tamás
  59. Nick Megoran
  60. Christian Krieger
  61. David Jasper
  62. Emma Loosley Leeming
  63. Massimo Faggioli
  64. Riho Altnurme
  65. Leon van den Broeke
  66. Hannah Strømmen
  67. Paul Brink
  68. Tornike Metreveli
  69. Sergei Chapnin
  70. Iványi Gábor jun.
  71. Kertai-Szabó Ildikó
  72. Ónodi István
  73. Verebics Petra
  74. Zsarnai Imre
  75. Lauren Morry
  76. Tobias Winright
  77. Rev. Vida Jaugelis
  78. Simon Hewitt
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

As you’ve reached the conclusion of the article, we have a humble request. The preparation and publication of this article were made possible, in part, by the support of our readers. Even the smallest monthly donation contributes to empowering our editorial team to produce valuable content. Your support is truly significant to us. If you appreciate our work, consider making a donation – every contribution matters. Thank you for being a vital part of our community.

Public Orthodoxy seeks to promote conversation by providing a forum for diverse perspectives on contemporary issues related to Orthodox Christianity. The positions expressed in this essay are solely the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the Orthodox Christian Studies Center.

About author

Have something on your mind?

Thanks for reading this article! If you feel that you ready to join the discussion, we welcome high-caliber unsolicited submissions. Essays may cover any topic relevant to our credo – Bridging the Ecclesial, the Academic, and the Political. Follow the link below to check our guidlines and submit your essay.

Proceed to submission page

Rate this publication

Did you find this essay interesting?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

Be the first to rate this essay.

Share this publication


Public Orthodoxy seeks to promote conversation by providing a forum for diverse perspectives on contemporary issues related to Orthodox Christianity. The positions expressed in the articles on this website are solely the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the Orthodox Christian Studies Center.


Public Orthodoxy is a publication of the Orthodox Christian Studies Center of Fordham University